Hi Steve,

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:56:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <[email protected]>
> 
> Several tracepoints use the helper functions __print_symbolic() or
> __print_flags() and pass in enums that do the mapping between the
> binary data stored and the value to print. This works well for reading
> the ASCII trace files, but when the data is read via userspace tools
> such as perf and trace-cmd, the conversion of the binary value to a
> human string format is lost if an enum is used, as userspace does not
> have access to what the ENUM is.
> 
> For example, the tracepoint trace_tlb_flush() has:
> 
>  __print_symbolic(REC->reason,
>     { TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, "flush on task switch" },
>     { TLB_REMOTE_SHOOTDOWN, "remote shootdown" },
>     { TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN, "local shootdown" },
>     { TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN, "local mm shootdown" })
> 
> Which maps the enum values to the strings they represent. But perf and
> trace-cmd do no know what value TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN is, and would
> not be able to map it.
> 
> With TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(), developers can place these in the event header
> files and ftrace will convert the enums to their values:
> 
> By adding:
> 
>  TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH);
>  TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(TLB_REMOTE_SHOOTDOWN);
>  TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN);
>  TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN);
> 
>  $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/format
> [...]
>  __print_symbolic(REC->reason,
>     { 0, "flush on task switch" },
>     { 1, "remote shootdown" },
>     { 2, "local shootdown" },
>     { 3, "local mm shootdown" })
> 
> The above is what userspace expects to see, and tools do not need to
> be modified to parse them.
> 
> Cc: Guilherme Cox <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
> Cc: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>


[SNIP]
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index db54dda10ccc..6b7fd0bf5d28 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -1704,6 +1704,102 @@ __register_event(struct ftrace_event_call *call, 
> struct module *mod)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static char *enum_replace(char *ptr, struct trace_enum_map *map, int len)
> +{
> +     int rlen;
> +     int elen;
> +
> +     /* Find the length of the enum value as a string */
> +     elen = snprintf(ptr, 0, "%ld", map->enum_value);
> +     /* Make sure there's enough room to replace the string with the value */
> +     if (len < elen)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     snprintf(ptr, elen + 1, "%ld", map->enum_value);
> +
> +     /* Get the rest of the string of ptr */
> +     rlen = strlen(ptr + len);
> +     memmove(ptr + elen, ptr + len, rlen);
> +     /* Make sure we end the new string */
> +     ptr[elen + rlen] = 0;
> +
> +     return ptr + elen;
> +}
> +
> +static void update_event_printk(struct ftrace_event_call *call,
> +                             struct trace_enum_map *map)
> +{
> +     char *ptr;
> +     int quote = 0;
> +     int len = strlen(map->enum_string);
> +
> +     for (ptr = call->print_fmt; *ptr; ptr++) {
> +             if (*ptr == '\\') {
> +                     ptr++;
> +                     /* paranoid */
> +                     if (!*ptr)
> +                             break;
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +             if (*ptr == '"') {
> +                     quote ^= 1;
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +             if (quote)
> +                     continue;
> +             if (isdigit(*ptr)) {
> +                     /* skip numbers */
> +                     do {
> +                             ptr++;
> +                     } while (isalnum(*ptr) || *ptr == '_');
> +                     /* we went one too many */

Hmm.. it looks like to skip variable name after a number.  Shouldn't it be 

                        do { ptr++; } while (isdigit(*ptr));

?


> +                     ptr--;
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +             if (isalpha(*ptr) || *ptr == '_') {
> +                     if (strncmp(map->enum_string, ptr, len) == 0 &&
> +                         !isalnum(ptr[len]) && ptr[len] != '_') {
> +                             ptr = enum_replace(ptr, map, len);
> +                             /* Hmm, enum string smaller than value */
> +                             if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ptr))
> +                                     return;
> +                             continue;

I guess it also needs to decrease the ptr here.


> +                     }
> +                     do {
> +                             ptr++;
> +                     } while (isalnum(*ptr) || *ptr == '_');
> +                     /* we went one too many */
> +                     ptr--;
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +void trace_event_enum_update(struct trace_enum_map *map, int len)
> +{
> +     struct ftrace_event_call *call, *p;
> +     const char *last_system = NULL;
> +     int last_i;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     down_write(&trace_event_sem);
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(call, p, &ftrace_events, list) {
> +             /* events are usually grouped together with systems */
> +             if (!last_system || call->class->system != last_system)
> +                     last_i = 0;

I think it needs to update the last_system here.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +
> +             for (i = last_i; i < len; i++) {
> +                     if (call->class->system == map[i].system) {
> +                             /* Save the first system if need be */
> +                             if (!last_i)
> +                                     last_i = i;
> +                             update_event_printk(call, &map[i]);
> +                     }
> +             }
> +     }
> +     up_write(&trace_event_sem);
> +}
> +
>  static struct ftrace_event_file *
>  trace_create_new_event(struct ftrace_event_call *call,
>                      struct trace_array *tr)
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to