* Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:07:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So doesn't a 'nokaslr' boot option still make sense, to be able to
> > debug KASLR failures and such?
>
> That's still parsed in arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
So was this duplication dead code in essence?
>
> > > + if (kaslr_enabled())
> > > + pr_emerg("Kernel Offset: 0x%lx from 0x%lx (relocation range:
> > > 0x%lx-0x%lx)\n",
> > > + (unsigned long)&_text - __START_KERNEL,
> > > + __START_KERNEL,
> > > + __START_KERNEL_map,
> > > + MODULES_VADDR-1);
> > > + else
> > > + pr_emerg("Kernel Offset: disabled\n");
> >
> > Nit: curly braces for multi-line statements and so.
>
> I guess by multi-line you mean multiple source lines...
Yeah.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
