Commit-ID:  c420f19b9cdc59662dbb56677417487efc1729ec
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/c420f19b9cdc59662dbb56677417487efc1729ec
Author:     Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:20:22 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:07:43 +0200

perf/x86/intel: Fix Haswell CYCLE_ACTIVITY.* counter constraints

Some of the CYCLE_ACTIVITY.* events can only be scheduled on
counter 2.  Due to a typo Haswell matched those with
INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT, which lead to the events never
matching as the comparison does not expect anything
in the umask too. Fix the typo.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 40898ab..2589906 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -212,11 +212,11 @@ static struct event_constraint 
intel_hsw_event_constraints[] = {
        INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01c0, 0x2), /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
        INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xcd, 0x8), /* MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.LOAD_LATENCY */
        /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_L1D_PENDING */
-       INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x08a3, 0x4),
+       INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x08a3, 0x4),
        /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L1D_PENDING */
-       INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0ca3, 0x4),
+       INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0ca3, 0x4),
        /* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE */
-       INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x04a3, 0xf),
+       INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x04a3, 0xf),
        EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
 };
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to