On Thursday, 28 of July 2005 21:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There are two problems with the compilation of arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > --- linux-2.6.13-rc3-mm3/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c 2005-07-28
> > 21:05:53.000000000 +0200
> > +++ patched/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c 2005-07-28 18:58:02.000000000
> > +0200
> > @@ -152,8 +152,10 @@ int __init check_nmi_watchdog (void)
> >
> > printk(KERN_INFO "testing NMI watchdog ... ");
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_LOCAL_APIC)
> > smp_call_function(nmi_cpu_busy, (void *)&endflag, 0, 0);
> > +#endif
> >
> > for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++)
> > counts[cpu] = cpu_pda[cpu].__nmi_count;
>
> This bit is no longer needed, since
> alpha-fix-statement-with-no-effect-warnings.patch got dropped.
OK
BTW, -mm3 works fine for me on two AMD64 boxes except for one thing:
On Asus L5D, if I resume the box from disk on battery power (ie the box is
started
on battery power and resumes from disk), it hangs solid right after copying
the image (100% of the time). If it is resumed on AC power, everything is fine.
Well, -mm1[1-2] did the same thing so I think I'll create a Bugzilla entry and
start a binary search. :-( The -git[5-9] kernels are not affected by this
issue.
Greets,
Rafael
PS
Could you please tell me how I can figure out the order in which the individual
patches in -mm have been applied?
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
