03.04.2015 03:51, David Miller пишет:
> From: Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru>
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:24:59 +0300
> 
>> @@ -2590,6 +2651,7 @@ static int mvneta_mdio_probe(struct mvneta_port *pp)
>>
>>  static void mvneta_mdio_remove(struct mvneta_port *pp)
>>  {
>> +    fixed_phy_set_link_update(pp->phy_dev, NULL);
> 
> I do not see any other driver doing this on shutdown.
> Please show me why it is necessary.
Hello David, sorry for this being discussed in a different thread,
so here you have a few pointers to why is this needed:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/30/367

> And if it is, all other drivers registering a fixed phy link update
> function need to be adjusted to do the same thing.
Or, for example, get rid of the callback and add an API:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg323517.html

Then you get the patch that avoids all this call-back singing and dancing:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg323518.html

In any case, I posted 3 different implementations and hope
people will choose the best one (any choice is fine with me).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to