Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 18:25, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Linus, please do an update from: > > > > > > rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perex/alsa.git > > > > > > ... > > > 65 files changed, 5059 insertions(+), 1122 deletions(-) > > > > The git-alsa.patch in -mm which I obtain from > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perex/alsa-current.git is > > empty. So we're now wanting to merge 4,000 lines of unreviewed code which > > hasn't been tested in -mm at approximately the -rc4 stage. > > ~2800 lines of which is a new driver. > > It'd be nice if ALSA's release schedule for "stable" versus "rc" could match > the kernel's. For example, 2.6.12 shipped with 1.0.9rc2. > > Maybe "rc" ALSA should only be accepted in rc1, by rc4 you hope they can wrap > things up and give you a stable version number? Okay, generally in-tree > version numbers don't count for much, but I think ALSA is a big exception > because it's maintained pretty much out of tree. > > Not so much of an issue this time around, but I don't think new drivers or > rewrites (even if they are reasonably separate) should be going in a late -rc > kernel. >
Independent of all that, there remains the problem that I was not obtaining all this new code from master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perex/alsa-current.git. Is there some different tree which I should be pulling from? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/