On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:07:50PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:18:14AM +0000, Punit Agrawal wrote: > > Hi Sascha, > > > > Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de> writes: > > > > > The thermal framework uses int, long and unsigned long for temperatures > > > in millicelsius. The majority of functions uses unsigned long, so change > > > the remaining functions to use this type aswell. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de> > > > > I'd suggest changing to long instead. It would allow the use of the > > thermal framework in environments where temperatures are below 0C - > > quite easily reached in many parts of the world. > > I agree to use a signed type. I also found it not so nice that the thermal > core does not support negative temperatures. I only chose unsigned long > because the patch got smallest that way, but I already expected this > answer ;) > We could also use int instead of long. INT_MAX °mC is still enough for using > a computer on the surface of the sun (Not for the center though)
Agreed, int is the preferred type. > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature