On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 04:53:52PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Inline update_temperature into its only caller to make the code > more readable.
I am not sure I understand how this is improving readability, can you
please elaborate?
The way it is now it is more modular at least.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index ebca854..6d0fdad 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -431,11 +431,15 @@ exit:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_get_temp);
>
> -static void update_temperature(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> +void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> {
> + int count;
> unsigned long temp;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!tz->ops->get_temp)
> + return;
> +
> ret = thermal_zone_get_temp(tz, &temp);
> if (ret) {
> dev_warn(&tz->device, "failed to read out thermal zone %d\n",
> @@ -451,16 +455,6 @@ static void update_temperature(struct
> thermal_zone_device *tz)
> trace_thermal_temperature(tz);
> dev_dbg(&tz->device, "last_temperature=%lu, current_temperature=%lu\n",
> tz->last_temperature, tz->temperature);
> -}
> -
> -void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> -{
> - int count;
> -
> - if (!tz->ops->get_temp)
> - return;
> -
> - update_temperature(tz);
>
> for (count = 0; count < tz->trips; count++)
> handle_thermal_trip(tz, count);
> --
> 2.1.4
>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
