This cleans up the most ugly workaround in this driver. There are no
functional changes yet in the decoding algorithm, but we improve the
following things:
 * Get rid of spurious warning messages on systems with fast HRTIMER.
 * If the clock is not fast enough for decoding to work, we give
   up immediately.
 * In that case we return EAGAIN instead of EIO, so it's easier to
   discriminate causes of failure.

Returning EAGAIN is somewhat controversial: It's technically correct
as a faster clock might become available. OTOH once all clocks are
enabled this is a permanent error. There is no ECLOCKTOOSLOW error
code.

Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer <har...@ccbib.org>
---
changes since V1:
call ktime_get_xxx() functions directly instead of using the wrappers
of the iio subsystem.

 drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c b/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
index 7d79a1a..4cb25dc 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
+#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
 
 #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
 
@@ -87,23 +88,11 @@ static unsigned char dht11_decode_byte(int *timing, int 
threshold)
        return ret;
 }
 
-static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset)
+static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset, int timeres)
 {
-       int i, t, timing[DHT11_BITS_PER_READ], threshold,
-               timeres = DHT11_SENSOR_RESPONSE;
+       int i, t, timing[DHT11_BITS_PER_READ], threshold;
        unsigned char temp_int, temp_dec, hum_int, hum_dec, checksum;
 
-       /* Calculate timestamp resolution */
-       for (i = 1; i < dht11->num_edges; ++i) {
-               t = dht11->edges[i].ts - dht11->edges[i-1].ts;
-               if (t > 0 && t < timeres)
-                       timeres = t;
-       }
-       if (2*timeres > DHT11_DATA_BIT_HIGH) {
-               pr_err("dht11: timeresolution %d too bad for decoding\n",
-                       timeres);
-               return -EIO;
-       }
        threshold = DHT11_DATA_BIT_HIGH / timeres;
        if (DHT11_DATA_BIT_LOW/timeres + 1 >= threshold)
                pr_err("dht11: WARNING: decoding ambiguous\n");
@@ -126,7 +115,7 @@ static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset)
        if (((hum_int + hum_dec + temp_int + temp_dec) & 0xff) != checksum)
                return -EIO;
 
-       dht11->timestamp = iio_get_time_ns();
+       dht11->timestamp = ktime_get_real_ns();
        if (hum_int < 20) {  /* DHT22 */
                dht11->temperature = (((temp_int & 0x7f) << 8) + temp_dec) *
                                        ((temp_int & 0x80) ? -100 : 100);
@@ -154,7 +143,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dht11_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
 
        /* TODO: Consider making the handler safe for IRQ sharing */
        if (dht11->num_edges < DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ && dht11->num_edges >= 0) {
-               dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges].ts = iio_get_time_ns();
+               dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges].ts = ktime_get_real_ns();
                dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges++].value =
                                                gpio_get_value(dht11->gpio);
 
@@ -170,10 +159,22 @@ static int dht11_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
                        int *val, int *val2, long m)
 {
        struct dht11 *dht11 = iio_priv(iio_dev);
-       int ret;
+       int ret, timeres;
 
        mutex_lock(&dht11->lock);
-       if (dht11->timestamp + DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME < iio_get_time_ns()) {
+       if (dht11->timestamp + DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME < ktime_get_real_ns()) {
+               timeres = ktime_get_resolution_ns();
+               if (DHT11_DATA_BIT_HIGH < 2*timeres) {
+                       dev_err(dht11->dev, "timeresolution %dns too low\n",
+                                               timeres);
+                       /* In theory a better clock could become available
+                        * at some point ... and there is no error code
+                        * that really fits better.
+                        */
+                       ret = -EAGAIN;
+                       goto err;
+               }
+
                reinit_completion(&dht11->completion);
 
                dht11->num_edges = 0;
@@ -208,7 +209,8 @@ static int dht11_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
                ret = dht11_decode(dht11,
                                dht11->num_edges == DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ ?
                                        DHT11_EDGES_PREAMBLE :
-                                       DHT11_EDGES_PREAMBLE - 2);
+                                       DHT11_EDGES_PREAMBLE - 2,
+                               timeres);
                if (ret)
                        goto err;
        }
@@ -274,7 +276,7 @@ static int dht11_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       dht11->timestamp = iio_get_time_ns() - DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME - 1;
+       dht11->timestamp = ktime_get_real_ns() - DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME - 1;
        dht11->num_edges = -1;
 
        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iio);
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to