On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:30:22PM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
> - if (rdma_node_get_transport(device->node_type) != RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB)
> - return;
> -
> if (device->node_type == RDMA_NODE_IB_SWITCH) {
> start = 0;
> end = 0;
> @@ -3069,6 +3066,9 @@ static void ib_mad_init_device(struct ib_device *device)
> }
>
> for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
> + if (!cap_ib_mad(device, i))
> + continue;
> +
I would prefer to see these changes in control flow as dedicated
patches, at the top of your patch stack.
For this kind of work a patch should be mechanical changes only, it is
easier to review that way.
Same comment applies throughout.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
