2015-04-08 12:43+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 08/04/2015 11:26, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> 2015-04-08 10:49+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>>> On 07/04/2015 22:34, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>>> We dirtied only one page because writes originally couldn't span more.
>>>> Use improved syntax for '>> PAGE_SHIFT' while at it.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 8f964525a121 ("KVM: Allow cross page reads and writes from cached 
>>>> translations.")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Cross-page reads and writes should never get here; they have
>>> ghc->memslot set to NULL and go through the slow path in kvm_write_guest.
>> 
>> Only cross-memslot writes have NULL memslot.
> 
> The power of wrong comments...
> 
> Considering how kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init is used (one 1-byte field, two
> 4-byte fields, one 28-bytes struct that is 32-bytes aligned, one
> 32-bytes field that is in practice cacheline-aligned), I wonder if we
> should just use ghc->memslot = NULL for cross page writes.  This would
> bypass the bug you are fixing here, and avoid worries about partial writes.

Good idea, and it could make those comments right :)
(Though in general, I prefer less constraints on APIs ...)

Partial writes would be a pain;  copy_to_user API does not define which
bytes were not written.  I think the write can't fail mid-page, which
makes our implementation ok, but I still worry a bit about it.

Anyway, here's the patch:

---8<---
kvm_write_guest_cached() does not mark all written pages as dirty and
code comments in kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init() talk about NULL memslot
with cross page accesses.  Fix all the easy way.

The check is '<= 1' to have the same result for 'len = 0' cache anywhere
in the page.  (nr_pages_needed is 0 on page boundary.)

Fixes: 8f964525a121 ("KVM: Allow cross page reads and writes from cached 
translations.")
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>
---
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index aadef264bed1..f3dc641f9640 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1637,8 +1637,8 @@ int kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
gfn_to_hva_cache *ghc,
        ghc->generation = slots->generation;
        ghc->len = len;
        ghc->memslot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, start_gfn);
-       ghc->hva = gfn_to_hva_many(ghc->memslot, start_gfn, &nr_pages_avail);
-       if (!kvm_is_error_hva(ghc->hva) && nr_pages_avail >= nr_pages_needed) {
+       ghc->hva = gfn_to_hva_many(ghc->memslot, start_gfn, NULL);
+       if (!kvm_is_error_hva(ghc->hva) && nr_pages_needed <= 1) {
                ghc->hva += offset;
        } else {
                /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to