On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:07:00AM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Communications with a hardware vendor confirm that the expected behaviour on
> systems that set the FADT ASPM disable bit but which still grant full PCIe
> control is for the OS to leave any BIOS configuration intact and refuse to
> touch the ASPM bits. This mimics the behaviour of Windows.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mj...@coreos.com>

Applied to pci/misc for v4.1, thanks!

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c  | 19 ++++++++-----------
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c  | 18 ------------------
>  include/linux/pci-aspm.h |  4 ----
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 68a5f71..1b5569c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -423,8 +423,7 @@ out:
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_osc_control_set);
>  
> -static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> -                              int *clear_aspm)
> +static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
>  {
>       u32 support, control, requested;
>       acpi_status status;
> @@ -495,10 +494,12 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root 
> *root, int *no_aspm,
>               decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
>               if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
>                       /*
> -                      * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
> -                      * that it's unsupported. Clear it.
> +                      * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates that
> +                      * it's unsupported. Leave existing configuration
> +                      * intact and prevent the OS from touching it.
>                        */
> -                     *clear_aspm = 1;
> +                     dev_info(&device->dev, "FADT indicates ASPM is 
> unsupported, using BIOS configuration\n");
> +                     *no_aspm = 1;
>               }
>       } else {
>               decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
> @@ -525,7 +526,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>       int result;
>       struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>       acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> -     int no_aspm = 0, clear_aspm = 0;
> +     int no_aspm = 0;
>       bool hotadd = system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING;
>  
>       root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -584,7 +585,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  
>       root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
>  
> -     negotiate_os_control(root, &no_aspm, &clear_aspm);
> +     negotiate_os_control(root, &no_aspm);
>  
>       /*
>        * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> @@ -607,10 +608,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>               goto remove_dmar;
>       }
>  
> -     if (clear_aspm) {
> -             dev_info(&device->dev, "Disabling ASPM (FADT indicates it is 
> unsupported)\n");
> -             pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
> -     }
>       if (no_aspm)
>               pcie_no_aspm();
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 820740a..7d4fcdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -782,24 +782,6 @@ void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int 
> state)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state);
>  
> -void pcie_clear_aspm(struct pci_bus *bus)
> -{
> -     struct pci_dev *child;
> -
> -     if (aspm_force)
> -             return;
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Clear any ASPM setup that the firmware has carried out on this bus
> -      */
> -     list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> -             __pci_disable_link_state(child, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S |
> -                                      PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 |
> -                                      PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM,
> -                                      false, true);
> -     }
> -}
> -
>  static int pcie_aspm_set_policy(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
>  {
>       int i;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-aspm.h b/include/linux/pci-aspm.h
> index 8af4610..207c561 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-aspm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-aspm.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ void pcie_aspm_pm_state_change(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  void pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
>  void pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
> -void pcie_clear_aspm(struct pci_bus *bus);
>  void pcie_no_aspm(void);
>  #else
>  static inline void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> @@ -47,9 +46,6 @@ static inline void pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(struct 
> pci_dev *pdev)
>  static inline void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)
>  {
>  }
> -static inline void pcie_clear_aspm(struct pci_bus *bus)
> -{
> -}
>  static inline void pcie_no_aspm(void)
>  {
>  }
> -- 
> 2.3.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to