From: Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com>

3.4.107-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 80e3d87b2c5582db0ab5e39610ce3707d97ba409 upstream.

This patch adds checks that prevens futile attempts to move rt tasks
to a CPU with active tasks of equal or higher priority.

This reduces run queue lock contention and improves the performance of
a well known OLTP benchmark by 0.7%.

Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Shawn Bohrer <sboh...@rgmadvisors.com>
Cc: Suruchi Kadu <suruchi.a.k...@intel.com>
Cc: Doug Nelson<doug.nel...@intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421430374.2399.27.ca...@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lize...@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 526c77d..71429db 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1293,7 +1293,12 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, 
int flags)
            (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
                int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
 
-               if (target != -1)
+               /*
+                * Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
+                * not running a lower priority task.
+                */
+               if (target != -1 &&
+                   p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr)
                        cpu = target;
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1570,6 +1575,16 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct 
*task, struct rq *rq)
 
                lowest_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
+               if (lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr <= task->prio) {
+                       /*
+                        * Target rq has tasks of equal or higher priority,
+                        * retrying does not release any lock and is unlikely
+                        * to yield a different result.
+                        */
+                       lowest_rq = NULL;
+                       break;
+               }
+
                /* if the prio of this runqueue changed, try again */
                if (double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq)) {
                        /*
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to