Something I didn't spot in my first look at this patch.

On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 11:12 +0200, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>  
> +config PCI_ST
> +     bool "ST PCIe controller"
> +     depends on ARCH_STI || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST)
> +     select PCIE_DW
> +     help
> +       Enable PCIe controller support on ST Socs. This controller is based
> +       on Designware hardware and therefore the driver re-uses the
> +       Designware core functions to implement the driver.

You can't have ARCH_STI without ARM, so ARM will always be set if this
driver is enabled. Correct?

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c

> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM)) {
> +             /*
> +              * We have to hook the abort handler so that we can intercept
> +              * bus errors when doing config read/write that return UR,
> +              * which is flagged up as a bus error
> +              */
> +             hook_fault_code(16+6, st_pcie_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
> +                             "imprecise external abort");
> +     }

So, unless I'm missing something obvious here, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM)
will always evaluate to 1. Can't that test be dropped?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to