* Luca Abeni <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is an update for Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt.
> Respect to the RFC I sent few days ago, I:
> 1) Split the patches in a better way, (so that, for example, Zhiqiang Zhang's
> authorship is preserved)
> 2) Tried to address all the comments I received on the RFC
> 3) Added another patch, to split Section 3 in various subsections.
> I think it is more readable in this way. Anyway, this is the last patch,
> so it can easily be skipped if people do not like it.
>
> I also split in a separate patch the discussion about the relationship between
> tasks' parameters and SCHED_DEADLINE parameters. This is (I think) the only
> part of the patchset that has not been previously discussed; I decided to
> isolate it in its own patch so that other patches can be applied anyway.
Note that your Signed-off-by lines are missing.
I also noticed the following inconsistency: 'utilization' (and
variants) is spelled in two variants in the text: 'utilization' and
'utilisation'.
I'd strongly suggest using 'utilization' et al (american spelling),
because that's how it's spelled in most of the kernel source.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
