On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:55:08 -0700 Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Interesting. But I can't accept this until I can test it. I don't have > > AFAIK that's a unique policy. I don't think any other maintainer operates > this way. Um, really? Other maintainers don't test patches that they maintain? This isn't like hardware that I don't have. This could certainly affect people if it breaks, and I will be responsible to fix it. I'm not going to do that until I have a setup where I can test things that break. > > > I wonder who's responsible for > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/ > > > > If they can add a i386/x86_64 build for gcc5 I'll be happy to download > > it and test this patch. > > That doesn't make any sense. > What, adding gcc5 to the crosstools suite? Why not? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
