On 04/14/2015 10:29 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> index 8b9e0a9..35cabe5 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described >> below. >> be one of: >> "psci" >> "spin-table" > > In the case of these two, there's documentation on what the OS, FW, and > HW are expected to do. There's a PSCI spec, and spin-table is documented > in booting.txt (which is admittedly not fantastic). > [snip...]
Perhaps a side topic, but I thought spin-table was being actively discouraged for arm64. Forgive me if I missed the memo, but is that not correct? -- ciao, al ----------------------------------- Al Stone Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. a...@redhat.com ----------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/