> > Do you still believe that your idea is simpler? > > Well, you have bundled do_make_slave(), pnode_member_to_slave() and > empty_pnode() all into one function. I think your original split is > quite nice. If you'd split this function up like that, I think you'd > agree, that the end result is simpler.
Also you can still use the pnode concept in naming functions and explanations. For example empty_pnode() is a good function name even if there's no 'struct pnode'. Pnodes still exist, they just don't have a corresponding object. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
