On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:42:55AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 12:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > But if we decide we want to go do this, I'd propose we reintroduce this > > delayed wake list thing again. > > Given that futexes aren't the only potential users, I definitely agree. > Lemme cleanup the patches and I'll resend. Now, one thing I wonder about > is if we should bother making it a delayed list a plist instead -- as > not all users would consider rt-tasks like futexes do.
plist don't work and should not be used for tasks anymore. I suppose I should go rip them out of futexes too. If you want to make the thing priority aware we should probably abstract the rb-tree from rtmutex.c -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
