On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:13:03AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote: > > I would be very happy to see a patch that adds cap_ib_smi to the > > current tree and states 'This patch is tested to have no change on the > > binary compilation results' > > There are too much reform there (per-dev to per-port), I guess the binary > will changed more or less anyway...
I think this patch series is huge, and everytime someone new looks at it small functional errors seem to pop up.. Doing something to reduce the review surface would be really helpful here. Not changing the same line twice, using tools too perform these transforms and then assert the patch is a NOP because .. tools. Some other idea? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
