Hi Tomeu,

Thank you for the patch.

On Friday 17 April 2015 17:24:49 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Introduce a new per-device flag power.force_direct_complete that will
> instruct the PM core to ignore the runtime PM status of its descendants
> when deciding whether to let this device remain in runtime suspend when
> the system goes into a sleep power state.
> 
> This is needed because otherwise it would be needed to get dozens of
> drivers to implement the prepare() callback and be runtime PM active
> even if they don't have a 1-to-1 relationship with a piece of HW.

I'll let PM experts comment on the approach, but I believe the new flag would 
benefit from being documented (likely in Documentation/power/devices.txt) :-)

> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.viz...@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/main.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  include/linux/pm.h        |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> index 3d874ec..728c2dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -1438,7 +1438,9 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct device *dev,
> pm_message_t state, bool async) if (parent) {
>                       spin_lock_irq(&parent->power.lock);
> 
> -                     dev->parent->power.direct_complete = false;
> +                     if (!dev->parent->power.force_direct_complete)
> +                             dev->parent->power.direct_complete = false;
> +
>                       if (dev->power.wakeup_path
>                           && !dev->parent->power.ignore_children)
>                               dev->parent->power.wakeup_path = true;
> @@ -1605,9 +1607,12 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev,
> pm_message_t state) * will do the same thing with all of its descendants". 
> This only * applies to suspend transitions, however.
>        */
> -     spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> -     dev->power.direct_complete = ret > 0 && state.event == PM_EVENT_SUSPEND;
> -     spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> +     if (state.event == PM_EVENT_SUSPEND) {
> +             spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> +             dev->power.direct_complete = ret > 0 ||
> +                     dev->power.force_direct_complete;
> +             spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> +     }
>       return 0;
>  }
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index 2d29c64..2e41cfd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
>       bool                    ignore_children:1;
>       bool                    early_init:1;   /* Owned by the PM core */
>       bool                    direct_complete:1;      /* Owned by the PM core 
> */
> +     bool                    force_direct_complete:1;
>       spinlock_t              lock;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>       struct list_head        entry;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to