Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com> writes: >> Also, as soon as Robert moves pxa3xx boards fully to DT, we'll loose >> the pdata timings option above. *sigh* >> > Well, such move would include proper timing DT properties for non-ONFI > devices. I will move several boards to DT, including several pxa3x boards, but not _all_ the boards.
For reference, I said in [1] this : > Actually, this deserves another discussion alltogether. My plan was not to > convert all pxa board files to dt support, but all internal SoC IPs drivers + > mach/plat support. > > Or put another way at the end : > - there will be at least one pxa25x board which is fully DT converted > - there will be at least one pxa27x board which is fully DT converted > - there will be at least one pxa3xx board which is fully DT converted > > - there will be at least one pxa25x board which is not DT converted > - there will be at least one pxa27x board which is not DT converted > - there will be at least one pxa3xx board which is not DT converted > > I want to keep the support for both legacy platform_data and DT for pxa > architecture. The idea I had was that only fully DT converted machines will > benefit from multiplatform support. And as you said Ezequiel, the problem will arise regardless of being DT or not, it's a lack of conformance of the zylonite board's nand amongst others. So the timings will have to survive somewhere, whichever place is seen fit. Cheers. -- Robert [1] http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2015/03/24/101 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
