On 16/04/15 10:30, Karol Wrona wrote:
> calculated_time variable caused warning as uninitialized. It was not harmful
> because it was evaluated in the path in which was used later but it is to
> satisfy the checkers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karol Wrona <k.wr...@samsung.com>
Dumb compiler. It's a false positive and as the function is an inline in the
header,
it should be able to tell.
What compiler is spitting out the warning?
> ---
> drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> index a3ae165..16180e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int ssp_common_process_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, void
> *buf,
> unsigned int len, int64_t timestamp)
> {
> __le32 time;
> - int64_t calculated_time;
> + int64_t calculated_time = 0;
> struct ssp_sensor_data *spd = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> if (indio_dev->scan_bytes == 0)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
