On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 02:02:17PM +0900, Taewoong Song wrote: > > On Apr 13, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 11:44:49PM +0900, Taeung Song wrote: > >> +static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char > >> *section_name) > >> +{ > >> + struct config_section *section_node; > > > > It'd be better to split declaration and function body with a blank line. > > > > Does mean it like followed by ? > > +static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char *section_name) > + > +{ > + struct config_section *section_node; > > ,or is it ? > > +static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char *section_name) > +{ > + > + struct config_section *section_node;
Nope! I meant static struct config_section *find_config_section(const char *section_name) { struct config_section *section node <-- here list_for_each_entry(section_node, §ions, list) ... } > > > > >> + list_for_each_entry(section_node, §ions, list) > >> + if (!strcmp(section_node->name, section_name)) > >> + return section_node; > >> + > >> + return NULL; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static struct config_element *find_config_element(const char *subkey > >> + , struct config_section > >> *section_node) And this is not how we put comma, please change it to static struct config_element *find_config_element(const char *subkey, struct config_section *section_node) Ditto for others.. Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/