On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 07:23:54PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 00:47 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I'm pretty sure at least one distro will go with HZ<300 real soon now > > ;-). > > > > Any idea what their official recommendation for people running apps that > require the 1ms sleep resolution is? Something along the lines of "Get > bent"?
Calm down. Any argument along the lines of the change of a default value in the defconfig screwing people over equally applies the other way around; by not changing the defconfig, you're screwing laptop users (and others that want less power consumption) over. The world is not black and white, it's a very boring gray (or a very sadening bloody red; but I hope we won't come to that point just because of a silly argument on lkml...) In the end, Linus will decide this anyway. I can understand that you don't want to change your application. Help developing the dynamic tick patch, and maybe you won't have to =) Regards: David Weinehall -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
