On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > This is a regular hardware enablement or are you saying that this is
> > backport
> > material?
>
> I would like the patch to be backported to distros or stable kernel because
> we may really see the issue in near future if it's not backported.
Then you should clearly explain that in a 0/N cover mail which
describes the scope and impact of the patch series. That way more
useful than a screaming BUGFIX prefix.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
