On 21 April 2015 at 02:41, Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 21/04/15 00:14, Tyler Baker wrote:
>>
>> The breakpoints test should only should be executed on x86 targets, so
>> lets
>> emit a skip and omit the installation when ARCH != x86.
>>
>> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.ba...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile | 7 ++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile
>> index 1822356..430b76d 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile
>> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
>>         ARCH := x86
>>   endif
>>
>> -
>>   all:
>>   ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
>>         gcc breakpoint_test.c -o breakpoint_test
>> @@ -20,5 +19,11 @@ TEST_PROGS := breakpoint_test
>>
>>   include ../lib.mk
>>
>> +install:
>> +ifneq ($(ARCH),x86)
>> +echo "Not an x86 target, can't install breakpoints selftests"
>
> It would make more sense to send this to stderr than stdout, people may look
> for errors there.

I'm ok with that. However, I'm going to remove this workaround in the
next revision of this series. I am planning to send another series out
to address the shortcomings of lib.mk. At which point I'll make sure
to log these errors/warnings to stderr as you suggested.

>
> Cheers
> Suzuki
>

Thanks for the comment,

Tyler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to