Em Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:09:06PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:46:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > +--no-children option on the command line or by adding > > > > > 'report.children > > > > > += false' or 'top.children = false' in the perf config file.
> > > > One can as well use the OPTION_FOO shortening mechanism and instead use: > > > > perf report --no-ch > > > > Which is enough to disambiguate it from "--no-column-widths" and > > > > "--no-cpu". > > > Are you saying that you want to add the short form instead of the full > > > --no-chlidren name? I think we need to verbose in the manpage at > > > least and it might not work in the future if some --chxxx option is > > > added. > > Perhaps: > > "--no-children option on the command line or by adding 'report.children = > > false' > > or 'top.children = false' in the perf config file. > > A shorter form on the command line can be used, for instance '--no-ch' > > is unambiguous at the time of this writing." > I don't think it belongs here. The shorter form is not only for the > --children, so it should be described in different place. Well, I continue thinking it would add value, as the possibility of shortening overly long options, like '--no-children' to reduce typing, is handy, mentioning this possibility here and there, when such long option names appears, would be of help. But I won't insist, thanks for addressing the other suggestions, applying. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
