On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> We could just do:
> 
> static inline int handle_mm_fault(...)
> {
>       int ret = __handle_mm_fault(...);
> 
>       if (unlikely(ret == VM_FAULT_RACE))
>               ret = VM_FAULT_MINOR;

The reason I really dislike this whole VM_FAULT_RACE thing is that there's 
literally just one user that cares, and that user is such a special case 
anyway that we're _much_  better off fixing it in that user instead.

The dirty bit thing is truly trivial, and is a generic VM feature. The
fact that s390 does strange things is immaterial: I bet that s390 can be
fixed much more easily than the suggested VM_FAULT_RACE patch, and quite
frankly, bringing it semantically closer to the rest of the architectures
is a _good_ thing regardless.

                Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to