On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:35:04 +0800 Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zh...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Currently we have many duplicates in definitions of huge_pmd_unshare. > In all architectures this function just returns 0 when > CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE is N. > > This patch put the default implementation in mm/hugetlb.c and lets > these architecture use the common code. Memory fails me. Why do some architectures (arm, arm64, x86_64) want huge_pmd_[un]share() while other architectures (ia64, tile, mips, powerpc, metag, sh, s390) do not? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
