On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:54:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > >  We could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack,
> > 
> > That would be more appropriate.
> > 
> > (I'm still not sure what happened to the idea of adding a call to 
> > "clear out this node+zone's pagecache now" rather than "set this 
> > noed+zone's policy")
> 
> lets do that as a sysctl hack. It would be useful for debugging purposes 
> anyway. But i'm not sure whether it's the same issue - Martin?

(Sorry..I was on vacation yesterday)

Yes, this is the same issue with a different way of making it happen.
Setting a zone's policy allows reclaim to happen automatically.

I'll send in a patch to add a sysctl to do the manual dumping of
pagecache really soon.

mh

-- 
Martin Hicks   ||   Silicon Graphics Inc.   ||   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to