On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:55 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Any objections to the patch below? I posted it last Wednesday, > but haven't heard anything. Once we have this fix, 8250_pnp > should have sufficient functionality that we can get rid of > 8250_acpi. > > > > Use types that match the ACPI resource structures. Previously > the u64 value from an RSTYPE_ADDRESS64 was passed as an int, > which corrupts the value. > > This is one of the things that prevents 8250_pnp from working > on HP ia64 boxes. After 8250_pnp works, we will be able to > remove 8250_acpi.c. We might always use 'unsigned long'. Did you have plan to remove other legacy acpi drivers?
Thanks, Shaohua - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
