On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:35:00 +0200 Sebastian Hesselbarth <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28.04.2015 17:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >> The current implicit GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it > >> very impractical for other software components licensed under another > >> license. > >> > >> In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees, > >> relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license. > >> > [...] > >> so I decided to keep the whole relicensing in a single patch. Please send > >> your Acked-by's in reply to this patch if you are happy with the > >> relicensing. > > > > I normally don't include the "or later version" for my license changes > > as I've only accepted to contribute under the terms of GPLv2. > > Ok, I guess this is a NACK for GPLv2+ but an Acked-by if we limit the > GPL part to GPLv2 only? > > If so, is everybody else who already Acked the GPLv2+ part also fine > with reducing the GPL version to "version 2 only" ? Acked-by: Jean-Francois Moine <[email protected]> -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
