On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 22:11 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:24:35PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > >> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:53 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote: > > > >> Having some of it refer to things as IBOE and some as ROCE would be > >> similarly confusing, and switching existing IBOE usage to ROCE would > >> cause pain to people with out of tree drivers (Lustre is the main one I > >> know of). There's not a good answer here. There's only less sucky > >> ones. > > > > The tide has already turned, we should ditch iboe: > > > > $git grep -i roce_ drivers/infiniband/ | wc -l > > 91 > > $git grep -i iboe_ drivers/infiniband/ | wc -l > > 37 > > > > It isn't really mainline's role to be too concerned about out of tree > > things like Lustre. > > FWIW, note that Lustre is under staging for a while, not sure how > close they are for actual acceptance.
I thought that was just the client and didn't include the server...
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
