On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:14:37PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 28/04/15 16:24, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:29:53PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> >> char msg[512];
> >> @@ -238,7 +302,8 @@ try_again:
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (perf_evlist__mmap_ex(evlist, opts->mmap_pages, false,
> >> - opts->auxtrace_mmap_pages, false) < 0) {
> >> + opts->auxtrace_mmap_pages,
> >> + opts->auxtrace_snapshot_mode) < 0) {
> >> if (errno == EPERM) {
> >> pr_err("Permission error mapping pages.\n"
> >> "Consider increasing "
> >> @@ -349,7 +414,7 @@ static int record__mmap_read_all(struct record *rec)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (mm->base &&
> >> + if (mm->base && !rec->opts.auxtrace_snapshot_mode &&
> >> record__auxtrace_mmap_read(rec, mm) != 0) {
> >> rc = -1;
> >> goto out;
> >> @@ -404,6 +469,8 @@ static void workload_exec_failed_signal(int signo
> >> __maybe_unused,
> >> child_finished = 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void snapshot_sig_handler(int sig);
> >
> > seems there's no need for forward declaration,
> > you can define the function right here, no?
>
> snapshot_sig_handler is dependent on "record" so the forward
> declaration does seem to be needed.
missed the record bit, ok
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
