Make generic bit handling functions return a bool type when they're returning
a simple boolean value.  This allows gcc to make better choices and produce
better warnings.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
---

 include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h |    4 ++--
 include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h          |   10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h 
b/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h
index 87f0f109d7f1..8048f8b38720 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 #define ext2_set_bit_atomic(lock, nr, addr)            \
        ({                                              \
-               int ret;                                \
+               bool ret;                               \
                spin_lock(lock);                        \
                ret = __test_and_set_bit_le(nr, addr);  \
                spin_unlock(lock);                      \
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 
 #define ext2_clear_bit_atomic(lock, nr, addr)          \
        ({                                              \
-               int ret;                                \
+               bool ret;                               \
                spin_lock(lock);                        \
                ret = __test_and_clear_bit_le(nr, addr);        \
                spin_unlock(lock);                      \
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
index 61731543c00e..c610b9943a08 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr,
 #error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
 #endif
 
-static inline int test_bit_le(int nr, const void *addr)
+static inline bool test_bit_le(int nr, const void *addr)
 {
        return test_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
@@ -74,22 +74,22 @@ static inline void __clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
        __clear_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline bool test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
 {
        return test_and_set_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline bool test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
 {
        return test_and_clear_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int __test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline bool __test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
 {
        return __test_and_set_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int __test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline bool __test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
 {
        return __test_and_clear_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to