On 04/29/2015 06:37 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 04/29/2015 03:37 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote: > ... >> The fourth and final patch fixes a bug in the emit_udiv() function >> when used to convert a BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K instruction in the >> ARM BPF JIT code. > > Shouldn't that fix go separately, so it can be included into 4.1 > resp. -stable?
Sure, shall I resend that separately from the v2 of the serie or is it fine in its current form ? > Would be good if you also Cc Mircea, who wrote the code. Was that > caught by lib/test_bpf.c suite (if not, would be good to add a test > case for it) ? It was detected by an internal test suite we have here. I see that there are some BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K instructions so it might also be caught by lib/test_bpf.c as well. Regards, -- Nicolas Schichan Freebox SAS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
