On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:22:21AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Why would you do this fall back? Shouldn't we just communicate > > > a concurrency limit to the workqueue code? > > > > It can't work with workqueue's concurrency limit because the > > queue is shared by all loop block devices, and the limit is on the > > whole queue. > > Maybe just cap max_active to NR_OF_LOOP_DEVS * 16 or sth? But idk, > how many concurrent workers are we talking about and why are we > capping per-queue concurrency from worker pool side instead of command > tag side?
Also we probably should have per device workqueues to start with.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
