On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:25 am, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:25 am, Peter Williams wrote: > > Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:01, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: > > >>You haven't quite completely fixed the SD calculations it seems: > > >> > > >> > > >>--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of > > >> simulated--- Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU > > >>None 2.44 +/- nan 48.6 98.7 > > >>Video 12.8 +/- nan 55.2 89 > > >>X 89.7 +/- nan 494 52.8 > > >>Burn 400 +/- nan 1004 20.1 > > >>Write 49.2 +/- nan 343 67.2 > > >>Read 4.14 +/- nan 56.7 96.7 > > >>Compile 551 +/- nan 1369 15.4 > > >> > > >>:( > > > > > > I keep trying > > > > The problem is a variation of the original one that I pointed out. The > > value that's being added to the sum of the squares of the latency is not > > always the square of the value being added to the latency. > > > > Would you like me to fix it and send you a patch? > > I fixed that too in what is in front of me (sorry not the one I've released > it was only clear to me when this report came back) and am still hitting > some bug somewhere. I've yet to track it down.
Silly me. The gaming emulation doesn't use periodic_schedule so I wasn't storing the data anywhere for standard deviation. Will release a fixed version soon. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
