3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_li...@m4x.org>
commit a3fa71c40f1853d0c27e8f5bc01a722a705d9682 upstream.
In struct wl18xx_acx_rx_rate_stat, rx_frames_per_rates field is an
array, not a number. This means WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE can't be
used to display this field in debugfs (it would display a pointer, not
the actual data). Use WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE_ARRAY instead.
This bug has been found by adding a __printf attribute to
wl1271_format_buffer. gcc complained about "format '%u' expects
argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u32 *'".
Fixes: c5d94169e818 ("wl18xx: use new fw stats structures")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_li...@m4x.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/debugfs.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/debugfs.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE(rx_filter, p
WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE(rx_filter, accum_arp_pend_requests, "%u");
WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE(rx_filter, max_arp_queue_dep, "%u");
-WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE(rx_rate, rx_frames_per_rates, "%u");
+WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE_ARRAY(rx_rate, rx_frames_per_rates, 50);
WL18XX_DEBUGFS_FWSTATS_FILE_ARRAY(aggr_size, tx_agg_vs_rate,
AGGR_STATS_TX_AGG*AGGR_STATS_TX_RATE);
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/debugfs.h
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
#include "wlcore.h"
-int wl1271_format_buffer(char __user *userbuf, size_t count,
- loff_t *ppos, char *fmt, ...);
+__printf(4, 5) int wl1271_format_buffer(char __user *userbuf, size_t count,
+ loff_t *ppos, char *fmt, ...);
int wl1271_debugfs_init(struct wl1271 *wl);
void wl1271_debugfs_exit(struct wl1271 *wl);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
