On (05/04/15 14:47), David Miller wrote: > > I think adding 64K of data to this module just to solve this rare > issue is excessive.
I'd based that number mostly as a heuristic based on rds_conn_hash[]. Any suggestions for what's reasonable? 8K? Less? (BTW, I think that should be 32K, or am I mis-counting?) > Furthermore I don't see any locking protecting the hash table nor > the RDS socket linkage into that table. yes, I missed that, I'll fix that in v2. --Sowmini -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
