On 05/04/2015 02:24 PM, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
> If frequency is throttled due to OCC reset then cpus will be in Psafe
> frequency, so restore the frequency on all cpus to policy->cur when
> OCCs are active again. And if frequency is throttled due to Pmax
> capping then restore the frequency of all the cpus  in the chip on
> unthrottling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c 
> b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 0a59d5b..b2915bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static struct chip {
>       bool throttled;
>       cpumask_t mask;
>       struct work_struct throttle;
> +     bool restore;
>  } *chips;
> 
>  static int nr_chips;
> @@ -418,9 +419,29 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = 
> {
>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>       struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> +     unsigned int cpu;
> +     cpumask_var_t mask;
> 
>       smp_call_function_any(&chip->mask,
>                             powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check, NULL, 0);
> +
> +     if (!chip->restore)
> +             return;
> +
> +     chip->restore = false;
> +     cpumask_copy(mask, &chip->mask);
> +     for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask) {
> +             int index, tcpu;
> +             struct cpufreq_policy policy;
> +
> +             cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
> +             cpufreq_frequency_table_target(&policy, policy.freq_table,
> +                                            policy.cur,
> +                                            CPUFREQ_RELATION_C, &index);
> +             powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
> +             for_each_cpu(tcpu, policy.cpus)
> +                     cpumask_clear_cpu(tcpu, mask);
> +     }
>  }
> 
>  static char throttle_reason[][30] = {
> @@ -473,8 +494,10 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block 
> *nb,
>                       throttled = false;
>                       pr_info("OCC: Active\n");
> 
> -                     for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++)
> +                     for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) {
> +                             chips[i].restore = true;
>                               schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle);
> +                     }
> 
>                       return 0;
>               }
> @@ -490,8 +513,11 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block 
> *nb,
>                       return 0;
> 
>               for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++)
> -                     if (chips[i].id == chip_id)
> +                     if (chips[i].id == chip_id) {
> +                             if (!reason)
> +                                     chips[i].restore = true;
>                               schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle);
> +                     }
>       }
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -545,6 +571,7 @@ static int init_chip_info(void)
>               chips[i].throttled = false;
>               cpumask_copy(&chips[i].mask, cpumask_of_node(chip[i]));
>               INIT_WORK(&chips[i].throttle, powernv_cpufreq_work_fn);
> +             chips[i].restore = false;
>       }
> 
>       return 0;
> 

Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to