On Tue, 5 May 2015 18:50:17 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Crap. Yes, I missed that. So __setscheduler() assumes that there is no > boosting going on. So we need: > > p->prio = effective_prio(p); > > there instead. Of course then we need to do something about normalize_task() (for sysrq), which depends on it being normal_prio(). -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
