Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Quoting James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset. > > > Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc. dbench and tbench were > > > run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each; results are mean +/- > > > 95% confidence half-interval. The 'static slot' kernel had a single > > > static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct > > > hlist_head security. > > > > Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps > > as secondary module) ? > > Will do. > > I'll try to get a full set of numbers by next week, comparing: > > no stacker > "original" stacker > stacker with one shared slot > stacker with two shared slots
Obviously, I meant to say stacker with one static slot (and one shared slot), and stacker with two static slots (and one shared slot) :) thanks, -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
