On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 08:13 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On 8 May 2015 at 07:47, Ivan T. Ivanov [email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 07:38 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > On 7 May 2015 at 09:36, Ivan T. Ivanov [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Add initial set of CoreSight components found on Qualcomm's 8x16 > > > > chipset. > > > > > > > > > > > > + replicator@824000 { > > > > + compatible = "qcom,coresight-replicator", > > > > "arm,primecell"; > > > > > > Shouldn't it be "qcom,coresight-replicator1x" ? > > > > > > > > > > > True, I still wonder, why we have to have this compatible string? > > Drivers are probed by amba_id and "arm,primecell", after all. > > > > Drivers have their own compatible strings for historical reasons, > something I've been meaning to fix for a long time now... >
Yep, I see that they have been platform drivers in the past, but now they are not, except coresight-replicator driver. IMHO, having additional compatible string could lead just to confusion. Regards, Ivan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
