On 05/08/2015 06:09 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Vinod Koul <vinod.k...@intel.com> [150508 02:04]: >> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:05:24AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>> On 05/08/2015 06:41 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: >>>> Now as far as this series is concerned, rest of it looks good so I am >>>> willing to merge to if you plan to work on defered probe :) I think its a >>>> fair bargain! >>> >>> Deal ;) >> Wonderful :) >> >>> >>> I'll take care of the OMAP/daVinci drivers for omap-dma and edma. >> Okay, I had asked for ACK on last patch as its ARM one, or do you want me to >> go ahead and apply it.. will wait till today > > It's best that I queue the .dts change as a follow-up patch once > the DMA changes are merged. Otherwise it's almost guaranteed to > produce merge conflicts with other dts changes. > > Peter, let us know if there's an issue with that. If so, we need > to set up an immutable branch against v4.1-rc1 with just these > patches so we can merge it in as needed.
Yes, the DT patches w/o the dmaengine changes will brake dra7, but it is not true other way around. The DT patches should be merged only when the dmaengine patches are in. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
