On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:15:42PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > I agree with you. Further, you made me think about it, and while it > was helpful when I wrote the patch, I don't think any printk() is > needed upstream.
Yeah, you're right. If a user did override it with cpu_init_udelay, it'll be in /proc/cmdline. And dmesg, and so on... > see v3 just sent. Looks ok. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/