On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:13:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * j...@joshtriplett.org <j...@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > > > > > > > > > > Can you please clarify that SOB chain? It does not make any sense. > > > > > > > > Co-authored patch. We both worked on it together, and sadly git > > > > doesn't support a commit with multiple authors, so this is the next > > > > best thing. > > > > > > No, this is not a valid SOB chain. > > > > > > For 'co authored' patches you can add credits either to the file, > > > as two copyright lines, or via the changelog, no need to mess up > > > the SOB chain for that. > > > > Fine, I'll write it another way. > > > > Do you see any other issues with the patch other than the signoffs? > > Looks good to me, but I have not looked very deeply ...
I sent out a v2 with the co-author information moved from the signoffs to the commit message. If it looks reasonable to you, can you take it through the tip tree please? - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
