On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10-05-15, 15:49, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> These files depend on Kconfig options all of which are a bool, so >> we use the appropriate registration function, which avoids us >> relying on an implicit inclusion of <module.h> which we are >> doing currently. >> >> While this currently works, we really don't want to be including >> the module.h header in non-modular code, which we'd be forced >> to do, pending some upcoming code relocation from init.h into >> module.h. So we fix it now by using the non-modular equivalent. >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> >> Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> >> Cc: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 2 +- > > Exynos can be compiled as a module: > > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm: > > config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ > tristate "SAMSUNG EXYNOS CPUfreq Driver" > depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412 || > SOC_EXYNOS5250
Sounds like things have changed since I did the original compile testing ; thanks for the heads-up and I will follow up with the details, once I can re-test. Thanks, Paul. -- > > -- > viresh > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
