You misunderstand. Although I am famous for hating out: labels, I would
not introduce a checkpatch warning to complain about it. This only
complains about GW-BASIC labels.
out3:
kfree(foo);
out2:
kfree(bar);
out:
kfree(baz);
GW-BASIC label suck because they are meaningless and lazy and, if you
introduce a new warning in the middle, then you have to rename them all.
In btrfs this only complains about the following two sections of code:
fs/btrfs/compression.c
732
733 fail2:
734 while (faili >= 0) {
735 __free_page(cb->compressed_pages[faili]);
736 faili--;
737 }
738
739 kfree(cb->compressed_pages);
740 fail1:
741 kfree(cb);
742 out:
743 free_extent_map(em);
744 return ret;
745 }
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
742
743 return 0;
744 out2:
745 debugfs_remove_recursive(btrfs_debugfs_root_dentry);
746 out1:
747 kset_unregister(btrfs_kset);
748
749 return ret;
750 }
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
